In the latest Econ Journal Watch, Stephenson and Wendt point out that virtually all labor econ textbooks ignore occupational licensing despite its empirical importance. In particular, they show that licensing matters a lot more in the U.S. than the minimum wage or unions. After all, almost 30% of workers now need a license to do their job, and licensed workers earn a 15% wage premium.
I’m embarassed to admit, then, that my labor notes suffer from the same omission – and I don’t even use a textbook! I have no defense, so I’m just going to say, “Mea culpa” and repent. The next time I teach labor in Fall, 2010, my lecture will be revised to give occupational licensing the treatment it deserves.
Update: Dan’s Klein’s PowerPoint presentation on occupational licensing is awesome.
READER COMMENTS
John Fast
May 14 2009 at 2:15pm
Does this mean that the correct answer to Question #6 on
Troy Camplin, Ph.D.
May 14 2009 at 3:58pm
I”m a good example of this. Someone with a B.A. and certification can teach high school, but I cannot teach high school even though I have a Ph.D., simply because I do not have certification. In the meantime, Texas, where I live, is complaining about having a teacher shortage.
Troy Camplin, Ph.D.
May 14 2009 at 4:03pm
Also, it is actually ILLEGAL for a principal to offer someone a job in Texas if they don’t have certification, even if the person plans to get certified. By law, they can only offer a job to someone already certified.
Actually, there are several strange things in regards to education that are illegal in Texas. For example, it is illegal for a teacher to tell a Spanish-speaking parent that they can request to have their child put in an English-only class. It is also illegal to talk about the content of the TAKS test (our standardized tests).
I suspect that the latter one is because if everyone knew what was on the test, they would be outraged that so many fail it — it is designed so that an IQ 90 taught by a mediocre teacher can pass it. And yet . . .
Ben Scafidi
May 15 2009 at 1:25pm
My paper with JJ Arias sheds light on the issue of teacher licensure.
http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/vol9/iss1/art4/
Vasco
May 17 2009 at 5:39am
I think the pdf link is broken.
Comments are closed.
RECENT POST
May 14 2009
Funniest Macro Line of the Month
Bryan Caplan
The prize goes to Scott Sumner for:[I]f you are going to use research by a brilliant Nobel-Prize winning new Keynesian economist in order to attack discredited ideas, then makes sure the discredited ideas being attacked are not... your own.Still, if I were Krugman, I'd be flattered that someone out there was reading my...
May 14 2009
Swine Flu and Hand-Shaking: A Question from the Fi...
Bryan Caplan
Here's a question from my final exam for Ph.D. Micro. Care to give it a try in the comments? Suppose that greeting other people is a special kind of Coordination game. We are in the equilibrium where everyone shakes hands; but there is an equally polite equilibrium where no one shakes hands. The only...
May 14 2009
I Repent; I Shall Revise My Labor Econ Notes
Bryan Caplan
In the latest Econ Journal Watch, Stephenson and Wendt point out that virtually all labor econ textbooks ignore occupational licensing despite its empirical importance. In particular, they show that licensing matters a lot more in the U.S. than the minimum wage or unions. After all, almost 30% of workers no...