
First, to all the fathers out there, Happy Father’s Day.
Walmart and Amazon Are Exploring Issuing Their Own Stablecoins
by Gina Heeb, AnnaMaria Andriotis, and Josh Dawsey, Wall Street Journal, June 13, 2025 (electronic edition)
Excerpt:
A move to launch crypto-based payments by Walmart or Amazon that bypasses the traditional payments system would send shivers through the nation’s banks and card-network giants.
With vast networks of customers and employees, troves of data and far lighter regulations, retail and technology companies have long been viewed as particular threats to banks, including regional and community lenders.
DRH note: Knowing my free-market proclivities, you might be able to guess what my favorite adjective is in the second paragraph above.
Tobacco excise has passed a ‘tipping point’ and is fuelling black market, economists warn
by Patrick Commins, The Guardian, June 10, 2025.
Excerpts:
Economists say regular increases to the tobacco excise have stopped working to further lower smoking rates and are instead encouraging a soaring cigarette black market.
Instead, they suggest either a freeze or a cut to the excise rate while Australia cracks down on illicit tobacco. However, a public health advocate warned policymakers not to be “conned” into a radical tax cut.
And:
Over the past decade, the excise rate per cigarette has tripled from 46c to $1.40. The excise now accounts for $28 of the average $40 price for a packet of 20 cigarettes.
For some time a rising tax was associated with the twin benefits of falling smoking rates and rising revenue, but after peaking at $16.3bn in 2019-20, federal excise receipts have plunged.
The March budget forecasts tobacco excise receipts will be just $7.4bn in this financial year – the lowest since 2012-13 – and will continue to fall to $6.7bn by the end of the decade.
Rather than a sudden collapse in smoking rates, experts point to an explosion in the availability of black market tobacco in recent years.
An equivalent of 605.8m cigarettes in illegal tobacco was seized at the border in 2019-20, according to government figures. By 2022-23, border seizures had reached the equivalent of 2.6bn cigarettes before easing to 2.2bn in 2023-24.
DRH comment: I vaguely remember when the Canadian government imposed a stiff tax of about $5 per pack in the 1990s. That would translate to over $10 per pack in today’s dollars. Growing up in Canada, I was used to thinking of Canadians as particularly law-abiding. (I’m not sure it was true, but that’s how I thought of my fellow Canadians.) But then we started hearing about boats crossing the St. Lawrence laden with cigarettes from the lower-priced United States.
Trad Wives and Tallow Fries: How the Wellness Wars Flipped Health and Food Politics Upside Down
by Elizabeth Nolan Brown, Reason, July 2025.
Excerpts:
“I don’t want to be told how many calories are in my Big Mac meal or my quarter pounder meal. I don’t want the government telling me that I can’t put salt on my food,” Sean Hannity declared on Fox News in 2010. “I like junk food. I like McDonald’s. I like Wendy’s. I like Burger King. I love Kentucky Fried Chicken.”
This was a common sentiment for conservatives of the era, a time when many on the right viewed attempts to promote health as left-wing and therefore suspect. Some of this Republican pushback was rooted in righteous opposition to intrusions on the free market and consumer choice,as when Democrats attempted to impose sin taxes on sodas or limit the size of sugary drinks stores could sell. But too often, it seemed more like oppositional defiance disorder.
And:
“The age of Big Gulp conservatism is over,” says Breitbart writer John Carney. “Now we’re into the protein- and blueberry-maxxing age.” And Carney—who jokingly calls yogurt with pomegranate seeds and blueberries his “neofascist breakfast“—thinks this is great. “I’d rather be on the side that’s healthy,” he says.
This isn’t just a story about MAGA going health nut; a lot of health nuts went MAGA too, partly as a rejection of the Democratic Party’s centralized public health dogmas, especially during the pandemic. The story of how we got here involves fertility fears and lentil wars, dietary science and social justice, losing our religion and gaining Obamacare. Perhaps most of all it involves COVID-19.
DRH comment: When RFK, Jr. was chosen as the secretary of HHS, I told a friend who was surprisingly uncritical of Kennedy, “Be prepared for the nanny state on steroids.”
READER COMMENTS
Mactoul
Jun 16 2025 at 12:24am
It has been nanny state since McGovern Committee. What business it was of Senate to inquire into food habits of a free people? But the free people and especially their elite didn’t turn out to be so free. Americans significantly changed their eating habits based upon McGovern Committee recommendations assisted by a compliant media.
steve
Jun 16 2025 at 11:29am
Meh. last food and chain restaurants (slower fast food) have proliferated during this time when we supposedly going wild on the nanny state over food. I am having a hard time seeing why larger restaurants are required to publish calories and where in the country do they limit how much salt is put in your restaurant food?
I actually think that the larger issue is that almost all food “science” is either total BS or wrong. For one thing most studies have compliance issues. Most look only at short term effects. Then you have the entire supplement industry which is mostly devoid of anything approaching science and full of pseudoscience. Eat in moderation and exercise at least occasionally. Fast food and soda are ok, just dont live on it.
Steve
David Henderson
Jun 16 2025 at 12:17pm
I think you missed my point. I’m saying that RFK Jr. is going wild over the nanny state. Not enough time since he acted to notice any trend in fast food restaurants.
On how to live relatively healthily, though, I agree with you, Doc.
steve
Jun 16 2025 at 1:18pm
Ahh, re-reading I think I missed your real emphasis. My apologies. I think its a bit hard to assess Kennedy since he basically makes money with all of his vaccine/health claims so I cant tell if this all a big con, but taking him at his words he appears to be a true believer. That makes him more dangerous in what he is willing to do to impose his beliefs.
Steve
Alan
Jun 16 2025 at 5:42pm
There does seem to be a problem when armies of food scientists, marketers, advertisers, chemists, investors, and psychologists work diligently to manipulate people into eating very profitable and very unhealthy food analogs. I’m not keen on a nanny state but am also unkeen on the current situation.
Comments are closed.