Here’s an email from an anonymous reader, criticizing my views on education. Reprinted with his permission.
So here is some anecdotal evidence in support of your
thesis. I’m a working stiff (first in law, now in the financial sector) –
but an absurdly overeducated one (PhD and JD). What I learned in four
years of college, five years of grad school and three years of law school did
nothing for my career. Maybe 0.5% of the law school curriculum was useful
when I practiced law. Being a lawyer is like being a plumber: you learn
on the job. I suspect the other professions are mostly the same.
What I got out of my education was the stamp of approval – pure
signaling. I suppose if I had stayed in academia the stuff I learned in
grad school (e.g., the scholarly literature in my field) would have been more
helpful, so the usefulness quotient would have been somewhat higher than
0.5%. You’ll have a better sense of that than I have.
But I remain stubbornly attached to the overblown,
romanticized, Allan Bloom-ish view of liberal education. My story here
isn’t all that persuasive, I concede. In those twelve years of higher
education, there were maybe four or five teachers who really moved me and
changed my path for the better. That’s it…but I think it’s enough to
sustain the (massively wasteful) ideal. If high culture (plus love) is
the only thing that makes our existence worthwhile, then a bit of waste in
pursuit of the goal is to be expected. (I’d rather that the waste not be
at taxpayer expense, but that’s a separate topic.) Would I have
eventually found all of those books, artworks, etc. without the handful of
great teachers? Sure, probably. I put nearly all of my free time,
energy and resources into things like literature, philosophy, travel, cuisine
and theater. (I won’t feel insulted if you distrust this
self-report.) So even with respect to the stuff I care most deeply about
I’m 98% self-taught. But I think the 2% I learned in school justifies my
higher education. It helped to kick-start me. It planted
seeds. I met some good people. If the schools had been better, and
if I had been a harder-working and humbler student, the percentage would be a
bit higher. So: two cheers (or maybe a cheer and a half) for liberal
education.