The Library of Economics and Liberty
Econlib
  • Articles
  • EconLog
  • EconTalk
  • Encyclopedia
  • Videos
  • Books
  • Guides

FEATURED BOOK

James M. Buchanan
  • Search Books
  • Books by Date
  • Books by Author
  • Author Biographies

Public Principles of Public Debt: A Defense and Restatement

By James M. Buchanan
SHARE
POST:

Book Cover
Publisher

none

Table of Contents
  1. Foreword
  2. Ch. 1, The Economists and Vulgar Opinion
  3. Ch. 2, The New Orthodoxy
  4. Ch. 3, The Methodology of Debt Theory
  5. Ch. 4, Concerning Future Generations
  6. Ch. 5, The Analogy: True or False
  7. Ch. 6, Internal and External Public Loans
  8. Ch. 7, Consumption Spending, the Rate of Interest, Relative and Absolute Prices
  9. Ch. 8, A Review of Pre-Keynesian Debt Theory
  10. Ch. 9, Public Debt and Depression
  11. Ch. 10, War Borrowing
  12. Ch. 11, Public Debt and Inflation
  13. Ch. 12, When Should Government Borrow
  14. Ch. 13, Should Public Debt Be Retired
  15. Ch. 14, Debt Retirement and Economic Stabilization
  16. Appendix, A Suggested Conceptual Revaluation of the National Debt
FIRST
LAST

Chapter 1The Economists and Vulgar Opinion

“Many a citizen will never be able to understand fully the problem of the public debt, for it is too complicated for the average layman. On these technical matters he will have to accept the word of the experts.”*6 This statement by Professor Seymour Harris has two noteworthy implications. It is, first of all, a rather severe indictment of the ability of economists to fulfill their educational task. Secondly, it suggests that the experts themselves are agreed on the “truth.”

On the face of it, the problem of public debt does not seem complicated. Indeed it seems quite simple when compared with the problem of the circular flow of goods and services in a money economy. Yet it is in regard to the latter problem that great insight has been imputed to businessmen and lay leaders in times past. Critical historians of economic thought may legitimately question the depth of genuine understanding about the unemployment problem contained in the Mercantilists’ or Protectionists’ “fear of goods” or even in the Reverend Malthus’ predictions of a general glut. But economists, especially during the last quarter century, appear to accept almost universally that common everyday opinion on the public debt is fundamentally wrong. Any challenge to this relative unanimity stands in danger of being rejected at the outset. Surely, we are inclined to say, the vulgar ideas about the public debt are grounded in almost pure fallacy, fallacy which is so simple and obvious that we expose it in the early chapters of our elementary textbooks. We use the common lay reasoning on public debt as a particularly good example of the fallacy of composition before we lead the sophomore on to the more stimulating endeavors of serious study. Everyday man-on-the-street opinion on this subject continues to remain less sophisticated than that achieved by the first-week sophomore. The first steppingstone toward economic literacy has not been passed until the whole set of fallacies in the commonly accepted ideas on the public debt is thoroughly exposed, understood, and replaced by the “true” relations.

Businessmen and politicians have continued to be skeptical. They have little faith in the economists, and even if such faith were normally present, particularly strong intuitions on this question of public debt might make them reluctant to “accept the word of the experts.” Economist experts have not been granted much additional responsibility in fiscal matters, and the vulgar theory of public debt has not been wholly discarded in public discussion. The fallacies must not be quite so obvious as they are sometimes made to appear.

The genuine critic should always examine both sides of the coin. Even at this stage could it possibly be that the economists have been wrong while vulgar or common opinion has been substantially correct? This question, so seldom asked by capable critics, is always worthy of consideration.

The test of truth in public debt theory is the same as anywhere else, the consensus of informed and intellectually honest men. In spite of the dominance of one particular conception, however, truth has not yet reached the point where it is entirely uninteresting. A re-examination of public debt theory suggests to me that economists have been in error in much of their recent work. This book advances an alternative theory or conception as “true.” But the current consensus being in opposition, the burden of proof must rest with me rather than with the new orthodoxy. My efforts to supplant the accepted doctrine with a different one must do more than criticize; they must be successful in converting.

To accomplish such a reversal of ideas is the primary, in fact the only, purpose of this short book. I shall try to show that the vulgar conception of the public debt is the only one which is fundamentally correct and valid generally. The theory of the public debt which is now accepted by most economists is, at base, fallacious.

6.
Seymour E. Harris, The National Debt and the New Economics (New York, 1947), p. 25. Cited by permission, McGraw-Hill Book Company.

FIRST
LAST
Categories: James M. Buchanan

SHARE
POST:
Enter your email address to subscribe to our monthly newsletter:
RELATED CONTENT
Boudreaux on Public Debt
Don Boudreaux of George Mason University talks with EconTalk host Russ Roberts about the nature of public debt. One view is that there is no burden of the public debt as long as the purchasers of U.S. debt are fellow Americans. In that case, the argument goes, we owe it to ourselves. Drawing on the work of James Buchanan, particularly his book Public Principles of Public Debt: A Defense and Restatement, Boudreaux argues that there is a burden of the debt and it is borne by future taxpayers. Boud...
Read This Article

COLLECTION: JAMES M. BUCHANAN

The article you’re reading is part of Econlib’s James M. Buchanan collection. Explore other James M. Buchanan articles:
  • The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy

    Geoffrey Brennan and James M. Buchanan
  • The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution

    Geoffrey Brennan and James M. Buchanan
  • Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes

    James M. Buchanan and Richard E. Wagner
  • The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan

    James M. Buchanan
Search Econlib
MORE OPTIONS
The Library of Economics and Liberty

Econlib

Home page Articles EconLog EconTalk CEE Books
Videos Guides Search About Econlib Contact Us

Enter your email address to subscribe to our monthly newsletter:

Contact Us Privacy Policy
Copyright @ 1999-2019 Liberty Fund, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
AdamSmithWorks Liberty Fund, Inc. Online Library of Liberty Law and Liberty