"Economics and Ideology: Aspects of the Post-Ricardian Literature"
By Samuel Hollander
David Ricardo (1772-1823), author of the influential
Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (1817), belongs to that more or less cohesive “school” of political economy for which Karl Marx coined the label “classical economics.” As a “comprehensive liberal philosophy” classical economics transcended narrow positivist economic science and attracted public attention, especially during the nineteenth century, by urging public policy reforms along a broad front of political, social, and economic issues. Armed with the analytical tools of political economy, the classical economists attacked the thorny contemporary problems of inflation, commercial and agricultural policy, as well as economic growth and the possible limits of the burgeoning population of the Industrial Revolution. Chief among the Scottish and English “classical” economists during the 150 years from the birth of its mentor Adam Smith to the death of John Stuart Mill, the eloquent voice of liberalism in transition, were: Adam Smith (1723-1790), Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832), Thomas Robert Malthus (1766-1834), David Ricardo (1772-1823), James Mill (1773-1836), Robert Torrens (1780-1864), John Ramsay McCulloch (1789-1864), Nassau William Senior (1790-1864), and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873)…. [From the text]
First Pub. Date
Literature of Liberty. vol. ii, no. 3, pp. 5-35. Arlington, VA: Institute for Humane Studies
Hollander, Samuel (University of Toronto). Originally published Literature of Liberty, vol. ii, no. 3 July-September 1979, Cato Institute.
The text of this edition is copyright ©1979, The Institute for Humane Studies. Republished with permission of original copyright holders.
A Critical Dissertation on the Nature, Measure and Causes of Values. London, 1825.
Labour Defended Against the Claims of Capital. London, 1825.
Popular Political Economy. London, 1825.
_______. Review in
Economist, 12 (18 Nov. 1854).
Theory of Political Economy, fourth edition. London, 1911.
Essays in Biography. London, 1933.
A Letter on the Notion of Value. London, 1834.
Lectures on Political Economy. Dublin and London, 1834; in
The Economic Writings of Montifort Longfield. New York, 1971.
Principles of Political Economy, first edition. London, 1820; second edition, London, 1836.
Principles of Economics, eighth edition. London, 1920.
Capital, I, Moscow, 1965.
Capital, III, Moscow, 1962.
Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy, (1857). London: Pelican Marx Library, 1973
Theories of Surplus Value, Part I, Moscow, nd; III, Moscow, 1971.
Principles of Political Economy.
Elements of Political Economy. London, 1821.
Mill, J.S. “DeQuincey’s Logic of Political Economy” (1845) in
Collected Works. Toronto, volume 4, 391-404.
Principles of Political Economy. 1848, Toronto, 1965, volumes 2, 3.
De Quincey, Thomas.
The Logic of Political Economy. 1848, in David Masson ed.
Political Economy and Politics, 10, 1897; N.Y., 1970.
Ravenstone, Piercy. [Richard Puller].
A Few Doubts as to the Correctness of Some Opinions Generally Held on the Subjects of Population and Political Economy. London, 1821
Political Economy: An Inquiry into the Natural Grounds of Right to Vendible Property or Wealth. Edinburgh, 1829.
Essay on the Influence of a Low Price of Corn on the Profits of Stock. 1815, in
Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, edition P. Sraffa. Cambridge, 1951-73, Vol. 4.
Principles of Political Economy. 1817, in
Works and Correspondence, Vol. 1.
Scrope, G. Poulett. “The Political Economists.”
Quarterly Review 44, No. 87 (January 1831).
Principles of Political Economy Deduced from the Natural Laws of Social Welfare. London, 1833.
Senior, Nassau W. “Report on the State of Agriculture.”
Quarterly Review, 25 (July 1821).
An Outline of the Science of Political Economy. London, 1836.
Wealth of Nations. 1776; New York, 1937.
Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge, 1960.
Thompson, T. Perronet.
The True Theory of Rent in Opposition to Mr. Ricardo and Others. London, 1826, ninth edition 1832.
An Inquiry into the Principles of the Distribution of Wealth. London, 1824.
Elements of Pure Economics. ed. W. Jaffe, fourth ed. def. 1954.
Introductory Lectures on Political Economy. Second edition, London, 1832.
Ricardian Economics: A Historical Study. New Haven, 1958.
Economic Essays on Value, Competition and Utility, ed. D.M. Nuti. Cambridge, 1974.
Eagly, R. V.
The Structure of Classical Economic Theory. Oxford, 1974.
Political Economy in Parliament, 1819-1823. London, 1976.
Groenewegen, P. W.
Economic Journal 83 (March 1973).
Hicks, John R. and Hollander, S. “Mr. Ricardo and the Moderns.”
Quarterly Journal of Economics 91 (August 1977): 351-369.
The Economics of David Ricardo. Toronto and London, 1979.
J.R. McCulloch: A Study in Classical Economics. London, 1970.
Pasinetti, Luigi L.
Growth and Income Distribution: Essays in Economic Theory. Cambridge, 1974.
Robertson, H.M. “The Ricardo Problem.”
South African Journal of Economics 25 (September 1957).
The New Political Economy of John Stuart Mill. London, 1972.
Sraffa, Piero. “Introduction” to Ricardo’s
Principles in Works and Correspondence, 1.
Bowley, Marian. “The Predecessors of Jevons: The Revolution that Wasn’t.”
The Manchester School 40 (March 1972).
Checkland, S.G. “The Advent of Academic Economics in England.”
The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 19 (January 1951).
Fetter, Frank W. “The Rise and Decline of Ricardian Economics.”
History of Political Economy 1 (Spring 1969).
Hollander, Samuel. “The Reception of Ricardian Economics.”
Oxford Economic Papers 20 (July 1977): 221-257.
Moss, L.S. “Isaac Butt and the Early Development of the Marginal Utility Theory of Importation.”
History of Political Economy, (Fall 1973).
Mountifort Longfield: Ireland’s First Professor of Political Economy. Ottawa, Illinois, 1976.
A History of British Socialism. London, 1929.
Cole, G.D.H. “Introduction” to Thomas Hodgskin,
Labour Defended Against the Claims of Capital. London, 1922; N.Y., 1963
A History of Socialist Thought. London, 1962
Foxwell, H.S. “Introduction” to Anton Menger,
The Right to the Whole Produce of Labour. London, 1899.
Thomas Hodgskin, ed. A.J. Taylor. London, 1956.
The Growth of Philosophical Radicalism. London, 1928, Boston, 1955.
Hunt, E.K. “Value Theory in the Writings of the Classical Economists, Thomas Hodgskin, and Karl Marx.”
History of Political Economy 9 (Fall 1977): 322-345.
The Ricardian Socialists. New York, 1911. In
Columbia University Studies in History, Economics, and Public Law, Vol. 46.
Medio, Alfredo. “Profits and Surplus-Value: Appearance and Reality in Capitalist Production.” In E.K. Hunt and J.G. Schwartz, A
Critique of Economic Theory. (Harmondsworth, 1972).
Meek, R.L. “Marginalism and Marxism.”
History of Political Economy 4 (Fall 1972).
Studies in the Labour Theory of Value, second edition, London, 1973. “Value in the History of Economic Thought.”
History of Political Economy 6 (Fall 1974).
Sowell, Thomas. “Marx’s
Capital After One Hundred Years.”
Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 33 (February 1967).
The Life of Francis Place. London, 1925.
Blaug, Mark. “Kuhn versus Lalatos, or Paradigms versus Research Programmes in the History of Economics.”
History of Political Economy 7 (Winter 1975): 399-433.
Theories of Value and Distribution Since Adam Smith. Cambridge, 1973.
Douglas, P.H. “Smith’s Theory of Value and Distribution,” in J.M. Clark, et. al,
Adam Smith, 1776-1926 (Chicago, 1928): 77-115.
On Revolutions and Progress in Economic Knowledge. Cambridge, 1978.
On the History and Method of Economics. Chicago, 1956.
Economics and Ideology. London, 1967.
Sraffa and the Theory of Prices. Chicester and New York, 1978.
Economic Doctrine and Method. 1921; London, 1954.
History of Economic Analysis. New York, 1954.
Stigler, George J. “The Successes and Failures of Professor Smith.”
Journal of Political Economy 84 (November 1967): 1199-1213.