Two main reasons for studying economics are often given in textbooks and classes. First, it helps us understand the social world we live in and, secondly, it informs better public policy decisions. An example comes from Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations. By understanding what makes a nation wealthy compared to others, we might be able to develop a roadmap for other nations to reach prosperity too.
![](https://www.econlib.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/WN-cover.jpeg)
A less often discussed motivation for learning economics is for better personal decision-making. Economists use economic reasoning to make better decisions in their personal lives, but they don’t always propose this as a major benefit to their students or the public. This is possibly because economics is too often conflated with the study of finance or business; economic theory is not a series of recipes for making money. However, it can help students get a clearer idea of how to make the most of life.
There’s a kernel of truth in jokes about how it doesn’t take a genius to get rich. Here’s one:
At a 10-year high-school reunion, a middle school math teacher arrives in a beat-up old sedan and an old buddy of his pulls up in a shiny new convertible and all the trappings of wealth. The math teacher recalls that this friend barely squeaked by in his high school classes. “You seem to be doing well”, he says as he greets his friend, “what’s your secret?” The friend replies, “I just follow the 5 per cent rule. Buy something for $5, sell it for $10.”
It’s true, and likely a virtue of market economies, that individuals with little deep knowledge of mathematics or how the world works can amass wealth, yet it is more likely that wealth can be maintained with some understanding of economics. It is possible to have a high income, yet little actual wealth if that income is mismanaged, or if opportunity costs are poorly assessed.
Basic assessment of opportunity cost can inform financial decisions. For instance, it is almost always better to finance something over a period if 0% interest is offered. If you have to pay $1,200 now or $100 per month for 12 months at zero interest, the latter is a better deal, as long as there are no other significant transaction costs that come with that option. If you make payments on time each month while earning simple interest on the money in the bank, and assuming the interest rate is 5 per cent, you will earn around an extra $27 in interest that year. Therefore, you get what you bought and $27 (which would be greater with compounding). Lots of such decisions can add up, and every dollar counts.
A corollary of this is that making early tax payments is likely not worth it. If you get a big refund after filing your taxes, you overpaid during the year and have essentially lent your money to the government at zero interest for the period between your payment and receiving the refund. Individuals may feel frightened of having a big tax bill at the end of the year, which is understandable. One could take the money that you will owe to the government and put it in an interest-bearing account until the end of the year, then pay the taxes and keep the earned interest afterwards. The same example above applies here.
The “efficient markets hypothesis” developed by economist Eugene Fama implies concrete advice about investing in financial markets: diversify and minimize transaction costs, you don’t know more than the market (and professional portfolio managers don’t either). Economics proposes no “get rich quick” schemes, but it does have a “get rich slowly” plan.
To be sure, many economists explicitly provide economic lessons for better decision making. Justin Wolfers and Betsey Stevenson focus on it in their podcast Think Like an Economist, which is still worth listening to, although they stopped producing episodes a few years ago. Steven Landsburg offers usable insights in The Armchair Economist. Tyler Cowen provides advice for using economics in An Economist Gets Lunch and Discover Your Inner Economist.
Bryan Caplan, in his blogging and new book, Self-Help is Like a Vaccine, has employed theory and clear thinking to offer actionable advice about real issues that people care about. Many have attested to the value of his advice, and much of this essay has been learned from him through his writing and teaching.
Jane Austen reportedly said that “a large income is the best recipe for happiness I have ever heard of”. While funny and true, the law of diminishing returns suggests that beyond a certain level of income, an extra dollar will not get you much more happiness.
Economists know that money isn’t everything. It is a stand-in for control of resources and the power to live the kind of life that you want. If you can secure that life through non-monetary means, then it makes sense to do so. Of course, many people without formal knowledge of economics are already great at using such thinking to make life decisions, they just may be unaware that they are doing it.
Giorgio Castiglia is the Program Manager for the Project on Competition at the Mercatus Center, and a PhD student in economics at George Mason University.
READER COMMENTS
Craig
Dec 7 2024 at 5:43pm
“Lots of such decisions can add up, and every dollar counts.”
Absolutely, pennies add up to dollars.
john hare
Dec 8 2024 at 4:34am
The formula for get rich slowly is “Make more than you spend, and invest the difference wisely”. Heard that decades ago and it still makes sense. Of course the application may be a little more complicated. Such as the math teacher in the joke may have a hefty retirement account invested because he drives an old sedan instead of new convertible. Keeping up with the Joneses can impoverish one.
MarkW
Dec 8 2024 at 7:27am
Or the math teacher (or cop or firefighter) may end up wealthy because of the forced savings of a ‘gold-plated’ pension plan. I met a guy once on a chairlift who was a retired teacher. He told me that when he was young, he was the ‘dummy’ in his friend group who went to Ed school while his smarter friends became things like engineers. But now, as a California teacher retiree (living in income-tax free Nevada), he said he was doing better than any of them. I asked him if he had any idea how much money it would cost to buy an annuity that was the equivalent of his pension, and he just got this little smile.
Craig
Dec 8 2024 at 10:17am
” But now, as a California teacher retiree (living in income-tax free Nevada)”
Wouldn’t the CA pension still be CA income subject to state income tax in CA same as if you lived in NV and worked in CA?
” I asked him if he had any idea how much money it would cost to buy an annuity that was the equivalent of his pension, and he just got this little smile.”
The NPV of pensions can easily be 7 figures, no question.
“The formula for get rich slowly is “Make more than you spend, and invest the difference wisely”. Heard that decades ago and it still makes sense”
Live below your means, absolutely.
MarkW
Dec 8 2024 at 10:59am
Wouldn’t the CA pension still be CA income subject to state income tax in CA same as if you lived in NV and worked in CA?
It used to be so, but Harry Reid apparently pushed through a law in the late 90s that made it impossible for CA to tax the pensions of people living out of state. At least that was the view of my skiing acquaintance (Harry Reid was his hero).
Craig
Dec 8 2024 at 3:09pm
Ah, makes sense, thanks for the follow up!
Mark Barbieri
Dec 8 2024 at 5:08pm
One of my favorite books about using economics to make better decisions is by your co-blogger, David Henderson – Making Great Decisions in Business and Life.
Giorgio Castiglia
Dec 11 2024 at 8:27pm
Thanks for bringing this to my attention Mark, I had not known of this work by David but surely will read it now.
Grand Rapids Mike
Dec 14 2024 at 12:28pm
Whole heartily agree on this book (Making Decisions in Business & Life) recommendation. Discovered it a few years ago, although the recommendations in the article are okay. I believe the book is much better and should be part of a econ program. How to use Econ is vital, it is not limited to policy decisions and the like. It is important for business and life decisions as highlighted in the book. Suggest every Reader of this site should get it.
David Seltzer
Dec 9 2024 at 1:43pm
I get zero interest rate credit card offers. The transaction fees are 3%. I borrowed $20,000 for 21 months and bought treasuries paying 5%. The first 12 months net return is 2% (5-3). The next 9 months yield is 5%. The average net return for 21 months is 3.2857. Classic arbitrage.
Simultaneous borrow and lend earn the spread.
Comments are closed.