The Financial Times recently reported that President Trump is encouraging OPEC producers to boost supply:
Donald Trump has called on Opec to push down global oil prices and insisted that central banks around the world lower interest rates “immediately” afterwards.
In a speech to executives in Davos on Thursday, the US president urged Saudi Arabia and other producers to lower the cost of crude oil, expressing dismay that they had not done so already.
“I’m going to ask Saudi Arabia and Opec to bring down the cost of oil. You gotta bring it down. Which frankly I’m surprised they didn’t do before the election,” he said.
“Right now the price is high enough that that war will continue,” he said, referring to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine and suggesting that the elevated oil price was helping to sustain Putin’s war machine.
“You gotta bring down the oil price, that will end that war. You could end that war,” he added.
Oil prices seemed to have declined slightly on the news.
I have mixed feelings regarding these claims. In the past, I’ve argued that we should remove those sanctions on Iran and Venezuela that restrict their ability to export oil. I suggested that this would be the most effective way of helping Ukraine in its war with Russia and North Korea, as it would reduce the revenue flow that helps Russia finance its war machine. Trump opposes that sort of sanctions relief, but if OPEC were to respond as Trump has suggested, I believe that this would also help Ukraine, for similar reasons.
I am less confident in the interest rate claim. It is true that lower inflation often leads to lower nominal interest rates. But the correlation is mostly between demand side inflation and interest rates. The Fed tends to “look through” changes in inflation due to price shocks in a single industry, and focuses instead on movements in the core rate of inflation, which is assumed to reflect the underlying trend. It’s possible that lower oil prices would have some effect on interest rates, but I suspect that the effect would be extremely small.
Despite my reservations, it’s nice to see Trump appreciate the advantages of cheap imports of a good where the US is a major producer.
READER COMMENTS
Craig
Jan 27 2025 at 3:46pm
As the pandemic unfolded and oil prices plunged Trump threatened to withdraw military support for SA if they didn’t CUT output.
Jose Pablo
Jan 27 2025 at 5:49pm
it’s nice to see Trump appreciate the advantages of cheap imports of a good where the US is a major producer.
On the other hand, it’s somewhat concerning to have a political leader like Trump attempting to dictate the prices of critical goods such as oil and money.
Wouldn’t markets handle this more efficiently?
Should other industries also consult Trump before setting their pricing policies?
And what about declaring cartels like OPEC illegal? If OPEC participants were individuals, they would have been in prison a long time ago. It is difficult to argue that they don’t “conspire to alter the price of goods”.
Perhaps he could go a step further and designate such cartels as terrorist organizations and even bomb their facilities.
That would at least signal some degree of politically coherent thinking. So, maybe.
Scott Sumner
Jan 27 2025 at 5:59pm
“On the other hand, it’s somewhat concerning to have a political leader like Trump attempting to dictate the prices of critical goods such as oil and money.”
I agree. I was just noticing the irony of this position, given his general views on trade.
David Seltzer
Jan 27 2025 at 7:07pm
Scott: Is DJT implicitly suggesting oil pries and interest rates are set in markets? Firms trade oil and bond futures on the NYMEX and CME.
Scott Sumner
Jan 28 2025 at 12:32pm
I think everyone understands that prices are set in markets; I believe he is proposing that OPEC boost output.
steve
Jan 27 2025 at 9:21pm
Since oil is an international market item I thought that OPEC helped set prices mostly by controlling output, so in essence Trump is asking OPEC to pump more oil. Concurrently he is also promoting more output by US oil companies. I am not seeing why US oil companies would want to increase supply and cut profits. They are already pumping oil/gas at record rates.
Steve
Jose Pablo
Jan 28 2025 at 1:51pm
I am not seeing why US oil companies would want to increase supply and cut profits.
?? Volume sold has a (very) positive impact on your profits.
And different US oil companies have different marginal costs. Don’t worry, they sure know what they are doing.
DJT on the other hand …
steve
Jan 28 2025 at 4:23pm
If they could have increased profits by increasing output they would have done so already. They have lots of federal land leases they have not used and most drilling leases are private anyway.
Steve
Vaidas Urba
Jan 28 2025 at 4:07pm
Bernanke’s 2008 decisions on rates were shaped by oil prices, contrary to his past research. Bessent might remember that.
Scott Sumner
Jan 29 2025 at 1:22pm
“Bessent might remember that.”
That seems extremely unlikely. I doubt that even one percent of professional economists remember that, and he’s not an economist. Most economists believe that Bernanke cut rates aggressively in 2008.
Thomas L Hutcheson
Jan 29 2025 at 1:31pm
What? The delay in reducing the EFFR (and not even to zero) was due to oil prices? How do we know that? What was the thought?
spencer
Jan 28 2025 at 6:11pm
You want lower prices, then drain reserves, like Bernanke did. You want lower interest rates, then drive the banks out of the savings business (which doesn’t reduce the size of the payment’s system). Dr. Alton Gilbert be damned.
Comments are closed.