
I’m eagerly awaiting Donald Trump’s announcements of increased tariffs on Liberation Day, April 2. I used to think that Donald Trump was an ignoramus who didn’t understand the gains from trade. But now I realize that he understands it better than we economists. All we have are our models and our logical reasoning. Trump has experience as a trader in the real world who understands that in every trade, there is a winner and loser. He also understands that when domestic car companies charge low prices to Americans, that’s good, but when foreign car companies charge low prices, that’s bad. I really must read The Art of the Deal thoroughly so that I may understand the source of his wisdom.
I wasn’t wrong to criticize Kamala Harris for advocating price controls during the presidential campaign. But I’m wrong for having criticized Donald Trump for warning auto companies not to raise prices after his tariffs on cars increase demand and his tariffs on aluminum and steel reduce domestic supply. The difference is that Harris is a Democrat and Trump is a Republican and that makes all the difference.
I was wrong to conclude, back in 2021, that Joe Biden had dementia. I should have gone with the insights of Joe Scarborough on MSNBC, who thought that even in March 2024, Joe was “better than he’s ever been, intellectually, analytically.”
In recent days, I’ve told American and Canadian friends that the new Prime Minister of Canada, Mark Carney, is someone who wants to regulate people’s lives because of climate change. But now, having read parts of his insightful book Value(s), I realize that, as a central banker, he has profound knowledge of climate change and much basis for his view that “the risks are existential.” Silly me for concluding, after reading Steven Koonin’s book Unsettled, that “[T]he good news is that the long-term economic effect of even substantial global warming will be small.”
READER COMMENTS
Henri Hein
Apr 1 2025 at 2:27pm
Heh!
nobody.really
Apr 1 2025 at 3:00pm
I commend Henderson for his willingness to acknowledge his own shortcomings and mistakes. Alas, I fear there may be a few more:
Spell-check that.
I wonder if Trump has read The Art of the Deal. I understand he’s not much of a reader.
Fact-check that.
There might be some glitches there; I just tuned it out. Not much of a reader, really. But many happy returns of the day.
steve
Apr 1 2025 at 3:27pm
I think this idea that trade is zero sum ie someone wins and someone loses is pernicious and has become more common. Occasionally someone is stupid, inept or whatever but it sure seems to me that most trade is win-win. At lunch today the lady seemed real happy to take my money and I was really happy for the Massaman curry. (Mine is probably better but it’s a lot of work.)
Steve
Manfred
Apr 1 2025 at 3:58pm
Steve – yes, exactly on point. For Trump, trade is zero sum. However, when you pay for a round of golf in one of his golf clubs, apparently it’s not zero sum.
Kevin Corcoran
Apr 1 2025 at 4:01pm
As Mike Munger likes to say, the answer is transaction costs!
Matthias
Apr 1 2025 at 7:26pm
Isn’t this more about comparative advantage?
Andy G
Apr 1 2025 at 5:02pm
I think maybe the folks commenting here should first check the date of the post…
David Seltzer
Apr 1 2025 at 5:14pm
Andy, Henderson can be a bit cheeky! I saw the title and laughed. Then I read the first paragraph. LMAO!
David Henderson
Apr 1 2025 at 6:14pm
🙂
john hare
Apr 1 2025 at 6:53pm
Ayup.
Charley Hooper
Apr 1 2025 at 5:26pm
Unfortunately, many of us have made the same mistakes. It’s time for a reckoning.
Personally, I blame it on my MMR shot and the food I’ve eaten with small amounts of RD&C Red No. 3.
Charley Hooper
Apr 1 2025 at 5:27pm
*FD&C Red No. 3
David Henderson
Apr 1 2025 at 6:13pm
LOL.
Monte
Apr 1 2025 at 5:26pm
I wasn’t sure from whom the traditional April 1st post would come, but I was certain Trump would play an integral part. And Scarborough and Carney make perfect foils. Might we, in some indirect or abstract way, refer to them as the 3 Musketeers?
David Henderson
Apr 1 2025 at 6:13pm
LOL.
Michael Grossberg
Apr 1 2025 at 11:52pm
Great post. Made my day.
Always nice to admit when you’re wrong.
More economists should develop the Hayekian epistemic modesty to do so – and think more carefully when they inquire into The Wealth of Nations, the Machinery of Freedom, the roots of Human Action, the relationship of Power and Market – and whether There Ought to Be a Law (Bastiat’s The Law, I mean.)
And remember: If you can’t do anything by yourself to stop bad policies, you can at least have a sense of humor about it.
Thomas Leonard Knapp
Apr 2 2025 at 6:30am
Fact-check that.
Well, he’s a life-long progressive Democrat, and governs just like one, but he did manage to fool the GOP into giving him its presidential nomination three times, so …
Knut P. Heen
Apr 2 2025 at 10:03am
I did not see the date. I read it as sarcasm. Equally funny that way.
Roger McKinney
Apr 2 2025 at 10:38am
Great April 1 trick! Congratulations!
David Henderson
Apr 2 2025 at 12:17pm
Thanks.
Mike Burnson
Apr 2 2025 at 10:40pm
As Trump very clearly demonstrated with his poster board today, these are the retaliatory tariffs. So many other countries already apply tariffs on American goods, many quite severe. Those tariffs are already in place.
Trump is NOT picking this fight. Trump is fighting back. He is also telling international companies to manufacture in the USA to avoid tariffs altogether. As a result, there are already planned investments of $4 trillion.
Trump has made the point many times that he will not cut SS and Medicare, the two largest expenditures. The only way to balance the budget is through dramatic increases in the tax base; DOGE cuts are only half the solution. Foreign investments to create literally millions of new jobs, removing people from myriad forms of welfare, more taxpayers paying into the system. This is how Newt Gingrich balanced the budget that is improperly credited to Clinton.
Comments are closed.