How I saved almost half my gross salary by living like a graduate student for a little over a year.
Kevin Corcoran’s post on toasters today was excellent. Early in the piece, he talked about how he managed to spend little money when furnishing an apartment. He didn’t say much about what his income was at the time, but I assume it was relatively low.
It reminded me of my situation in 1975, when I moved to Rochester, NY as an assistant professor in the University of Rochester’s Graduate School of Management. My income wasn’t low; it was high. Including summer money for the summer of 1976, it was approximately $20,000. Adjusted by the Consumer Price Index (which, admittedly, overstates inflation), it was about $116,000 in November 2024 prices.
But I had an added constraint. I arrived at the U of R on an F-1 student visa and without my dissertation being done. I was able to be a faculty member because I was engaged in “practical training.” The government allowed up to 3 6-month stints of practical training. That would take me to January 1977. I calculated that I had to finish my dissertation and have it approved by early December 1976 so that I could get the Ph.D. in 1976 and have the U.S. Labor Department certify that no American could do my job (I was that special!) and, therefore, I could get my green card.
But what if I didn’t finish by then? I was still in the midst of getting data from various state mining authorities. (My dissertation was on the effects of safety legislation in underground coal mines.) I didn’t know how fast my main advisor, Harold Demsetz, would be at getting me feedback on chapters. (He turned out to be great, but I didn’t know that in advance.)
A number of things could go wrong. I needed a Plan B. And having a plausible Plan B would reduce my stress at pursuing Plan A: writing my dissertation on time.
Here was my Plan B. One provision of the immigration law at the time stated that if you came to the United States to start a business and invested at least $10,000 in the business, you could get a green card. (The amount today has been adjusted to $500,000.) So my goal was to save at least $10,000 and, if I didn’t get my dissertation done in time, start a business. What business? I would start a book store and have it open from 1:00 p.m to 5:00 p.m. I would spend my mornings, my most productive time, finishing my dissertation.
I started off at a deficit. I owed my ex-wife $1,000 and, because she had to get major repairs on her car, I sent her an extra $1,000. So that took a large hunk out of my first few months’ pay.
My plan was to live like a graduate student. I had already lived like that for 3 years and had done without a car in Los Angeles. I would buy a modest-priced car (which turned out to be a lemon, but that’s another story) on credit.
I found a very modestly priced 2-bedroom apartment. I heard about it from two secretaries at the U of R who had shared it but were going their separate ways. When someone asked me how I would furnish my apartment, I replied that the motif was “early American graduate student.” I bought a used bed, a used couch, and a used kitchen table and chairs. (By the way, the kitchen table and chairs lasted well into the 1980s.) I already had dishes, a stereo, records, and a bicycle, all of which I brought from Los Angeles. I was set.
I rarely went to restaurants and, if I did, it was closer to McDonald’s than to Steak and Ale. Funny story: when I interviewed there, Richard Thaler was on the faculty. He told me that there were almost no good restaurants in Rochester. It turns out that he and I had a very different view of “good.” To me, somewhat better than McDonald’s qualified as good.
Remember that I also had moved to high-tax state and I was single. This was before inflation-indexing of the tax brackets, either in New York or in the United States. And I had few deductions and even less idea of how to maneuver within the tax system. So taxes took a large bite. The one saving grace–and it was a big one–was that because I wasn’t a resident, I was exempt from Social Security.
So, with all that, how much did I save by the late fall of 1976?
Are you ready?
$9,200.
It would have been easy to ask my father, a man of modest means, for a loan of $800 to get me to the magic $10,000 mark.
And, to put it in perspective, I lived better than I had as a great student. If, for example, I wanted to take a woman for a drink, I could so occasionally. If I wanted to drive up to Toronto and see my sister and a few friends, I could do so.
That was a good lesson in saving that served me well when, in the 1990s, we sent our daughter to an expensive private school from Grade 5 on and then to an expensive private college.
If you detect more than a little pride in my telling of this story, you have a good detector. I’m still very proud of what I did. That saving turned to be important in my buying my first house, in 1978.
By the way, my strategy didn’t work in the short run. In July 1977, the Immigration and Naturalization “Service” turned me down for a green card and immediately began deportation proceedings. But that’s also another story.
The picture above is of a used couch.
READER COMMENTS
Craig
Jan 3 2025 at 8:36pm
“Saving Money by Not Spending”
Cutting expenses for many is often low hanging fruit. Whether its recurring monthly charges for things people aren’t availing themselves of or simply forbearance which is one of the cornerstones of future prosperity for sure. The thing of it is that one needs to first, earn the money, then get taxed on it, and THEN spend it, so when you save that expense you’re really having the dynamic effect of lawfully avoiding the tax one would allocate to that expense.
Of course when trying to find expenses to cut some low hanging fruit might included such activities as unused gym membership or the ultimate negative utility expenses like quitting cigarettes. But even before giving up cigarettes I would strongly urge ANYBODY anywhere and I would rarely, if ever, hear an objection, to give up charitable payments to ones ex-wife. Yet I read: “I owed my ex-wife $1,000 and, because she had to get major repairs on her car, I sent her an extra $1,000.”
Meanwhile: “I would buy a modest-priced car (which turned out to be a lemon, but that’s another story) on credit.” <–what interest rate then in the 1970s? Remember, earn, pay tax, spend money on interest expense, that’s almost as bad as cigarettes.
[I could {do} so occasionally]
[in my bu[y]ing my first house]
“If you detect more than a little pride in my telling of this story, you have a good detector. I’m still very proud of what I did. ”
And those habits you instilled were priceless as well you turned that into a nice safety portfolio for yourself.
I’d take my check, physical then, I’d go to the HSBC bank on the corner of 46th and 6th in Midtown, which is still there but now its an ICBC (same bank? not sure), and I’d put in 90% of it, cash for the rest, and no ATM card because when I went back to NJ even if I wanted to get the money it wouldn’t be practical for me to do so since no HSBC bank was close by. Rent? I did the NJ extended adolescence thing until I was married.
Richard Fulmer
Jan 3 2025 at 8:37pm
Did you find that safety legislation reduced underground coal mining accidents, or was there just a continuation of the steady decline in accidents that had been occurring since at least 1900?
Someone (Rob Bradley?) suggested that antitrust laws may have had a malign impact on coal mine safety by discouraging large companies from buying up shoestring operations that had poor safety records. Is that a possibility?
Thomas L Hutcheson
Jan 4 2025 at 7:56am
A progressive consumption (instead of income) tax and VAT (instead of the wage tax for financing social insurance) would be perfect for encouraging this kind of pro-social behavior.
T. Boyle
Jan 4 2025 at 11:54am
A phenomenon I’ve observed among more than a few friends is that marriage ends all hope of frugality. While it’s not a universal law, it’s quite common to see that one partner is willing, but the other isn’t. For the frugal partner it’s a tragedy of the commons: either spend your money on things you want but don’t need and wouldn’t otherwise have bought; or watch it get spent on things you neither want nor need. Usually, adding insult to injury, it’s the higher-income partner who would like to be frugal – but not always. With divorce as the only way to stop the spending train, there’s not much to be done – especially for the higher-income spouse, given how family law operates.
john hare
Jan 4 2025 at 5:27pm
I’ve been in that trap more than once. My wife now is on the same page and it is amazing the difference it makes. In less than four years we have moved further than previous much longer relationships in which I tried to outearn the problem.
Alan Goldhammer
Jan 4 2025 at 2:45pm
I traveled a very similar path to the one David traveled, except my PhD thesis was finished in July of 1975. I also journeyed to upstate NY, Ithaca on a National Institutes of Health post-doctoral fellowship. I was officially without my PhD as the thesis defense could not be done during the summer so I had to fly back to Indiana in September to do that. IIRC, I made half of what David did but the cost of living in Ithaca was quite low. This being the days before electronic banking, I received a monthly stipend check in the mail.
As Cornell has a first-rate school of hotel management, a number grads stayed in Ithaca and opened restaurants. One of the first all-vegetarian restaurants, The Moosewood Cafe, opened about the same time as I arrived. It’s still going strong almost 50 years now.
I didn’t have the visa issue to deal with but still managed to put away a goodly sum of money during the three years I was there. I agree with David, that frugal living is not all that difficult.
David Henderson
Jan 4 2025 at 4:50pm
Thanks, Alan.
I remember Mollie Katzen, who wrote the Moosewood Cookbook. She was from Rochester and she came through to give a talk. I bought her book and we had a very pleasant conversation.
Jose Pablo
Jan 4 2025 at 3:52pm
From the experience of a certain age, I tend to regard George Best’s as the best advice on spending and saving I have ever heard.
“I spent a lot of money on booze, birds, and fast cars. The rest I just squandered”
I have saved way too much. And all these savings will be lost like tears in the rain.
And now it is just too late to live the experiences I have missed. All this Puritan advice has ruined my only life.
Herb
Jan 9 2025 at 1:32am
Ah, yes, I know what you mean; my children/grandchildren will enjoy the results.
steve
Jan 5 2025 at 12:10pm
I still like the idea of moderation in all things. You can take savings too far and miss out on life as I think Jose is trying to point out, however, with minimal effort (I think) you can save a lot of money. Our best sofa is still an Ikea sofa and some of our best furniture was used which i have refinished. Cars have been reliable for quite a while now so we keep them for 10 years or longer not feeling any need to have the latest model. We are foodies and while we cook a lot we do like to go out but if you are actually going out for good food rather than a fancy experience you dont need to spend a lot. We are going out later for Peruvian food at a strip mall place where I will get good food, more than I can eat and will pay maybe 20% more than going to MacDonalds. Finally, just set your savings aside first and dont just save what’s left over.
Steve
David Henderson
Jan 5 2025 at 2:52pm
You wrote:
I agree.
You wrote:
I agree. But it was worth doing it to immigrate. Or, at least, it would have been worth it had Plan A not worked out.
Jose Pablo
Jan 6 2025 at 11:23am
Spending money in “a” (getting a VISA) instead of “b” (getting a better couch), is a matter of preferences and makes sense if (but only if) you get more utility from getting a VISA than from getting a better couch.
Saving for the sake of saving makes no sense. Except if you get utility from having a big rainy day fund (which some people do) in which case it is, again, a matter of preference. Some people will get more utility from spending their money on “booze, chicks, and fast cars“, and this is an equally valid preference.
No general conclusion or generally valid advice can be drawn from a personal preference for VISAs or savings.