The federal government is in the process of auctioning off a famous office building in Laguna Niguel, California. The Chet Holifield Federal Building, sometimes referred to as the Ziggurat, was designed by William Pereira, a well regarded architect. It’s an interesting building, done in a sort of Mesopotamian style, but to my eye not particularly successful:
The OC Register has had a series of news stories on the auction, where feverish bidding has pushed the price to a much higher than expected level. This is presumably because the property includes not just the office building, but also 89 acres of land in one of California’s most desirable communities, just a few miles from Laguna Beach. The article contains this graph:
Note that the original asking price was only $70 million. One reason why people were caught off guard is that this is actually the GSA’s second attempt to sell the building:
By the way, this is the second auction for the 53-year-old Ziggurat, The first, which required the buyer to preserve the Ziggurat structure, drew no bids. The lengthy response to the latest auction – without that restriction on development – suggests the buyer will likely demolish the structure designed by the late famed architect William Pereira.
Not a single developer was willing to bid even $70 million for this highly desirable property at a time when there was requirement that the building be saved. Once that restriction was lifted, at least two developers were willing to pay more than $150 million (and the auction is still ongoing.)
From this information, we can infer that the economic cost of this particular regulatory barrier was at least $84 million, the difference between the current auction price and the previous auction’s reserve price.
But even that figure is a gross underestimate of the cost of regulation for this property. Although the new owner will be allowed to remove this eyesore, they will continue to face a Byzantine thicket of regulations and lawsuits, from all sorts of interest groups that hope to minimize the amount of development. After all, this is California.
While I cannot be certain, I suspect that a developer would be willing to pay many hundreds of millions of dollars for this property if given a completely free hand to develop it any way they wished. I also suspect that the resulting development would be extremely impressive—the sort of grand project that the US used to be good at doing, but that has somehow become beyond our ability.
READER COMMENTS
Matthias
Sep 15 2024 at 10:45am
Interesting coincidence that here we have a natural experiment to see the price of this particular stipulation.
I just had a look at the building and the surrounding area on Google Earth to get a better idea of how ugly it really is.
But, like almost always in North America (US and Canada at least) the real eye sore is all the surface car parking. The car park takes up a lot more space than the building.
Scott Sumner
Sep 15 2024 at 6:40pm
Yes, I agree. You can be sure the developer will reduce the amount of surface parking. Disneyland is currently replacing lots of inefficient surface parking with more efficient ramps.
nobody.really
Sep 17 2024 at 3:04pm
“Ramps”? Not “garages” or “parking structures”? Where did you grow up?
David S
Sep 16 2024 at 2:22am
This is a major victory over the lunatic fringe of the Historic Preservation movement in architecture. It probably helped that Pereira had more interesting buildings elsewhere.
The winning bidder may try to permit mid-rise, mixed use buildings in that location. I can imagine that some neighbors will object because it will clash with the character of the strip mall to the north and block views of the high school.
Rob
Sep 17 2024 at 5:43pm
When I was a teenager in Laguna Beach in the 1980’s the Ziggeraut was the place our parents took us to learn to drive. So many vast empty parking lots!