An Econlib article by Peter Boettke on “Virginia Political Economy: James Buchanan’s Journey” shows how political philosophy and economics were enmeshed in Buchanan’s work. It also reminded me of an interesting two-part video of an interview of Buchanan by Geoffrey Brennan. The two economists often worked together and were notably co-authors of The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy (1985), which provides a summary of the contractarian and constitutional construction that is central to their work. (This classic book is available online; I recently reviewed it for Econlib.)
The video gives a less technical and more conversational overview of the work of Buchanan, who died in 2013. At the very end of the two-hour conversation, Buchanan disserts on what he believes, à la Albert Camus, is the ultimate absurdity of life, except for one sort of consideration. He confesses a departure from methodological individualism as if death and the meaning of life (or at least of his life) require an exception. I wish the whole conversation were transcribed, if only because a Southern accent is not exactly a French accent. In my own transcription of that passage below, the ellipses indicate conversational hesitations, details, or simply words that I could not identify; Buchanan continues about life:
The whole thing may be absurd. What is it all about? … Why is it that I am interested in what’s going to happen when I am no longer around. In my case, it can’t be genetic because I don’t have any children. … But yet then I am intensely interested in that. … It seems to me that—and this does get me a bit away from the methodological individualism … we, or at least I, feel like I am a kind of member of a kind of a tribe, what we might call a tribe that is a continuing tribe, it doesn’t die … it may die, but it does not necessarily die, but it does beyond my mortality, it’s kind of a tribe that would called, described as the spirit of liberty or the spirit of classical liberalism. And it seems to me as a participant in that game … furthering those ideas … and I live as long as those ideas live in a way. I am just a part of a stream and in a sense that stream is moving on. Now it takes people to keep pushing and keep motivating that stream, or else the stream can die, it’s not necessarily immortal. On the other hand, it transcends human life … it provides meaning to ordinary life. … It seems to me the spirit of liberalism, the spirit of classical liberalism, or the spirit of liberty if you want, can be a kind of justification that sort of gets you away form this ultimate absurdity in a way.
There are great mysteries in the universe that lie much beyond political philosophy. But whether life is meaningful or absurd, whether eternal life exists or not, it is always the individual who experiences life or death. “Tho’ there is a God or not,” sang poet Leonard Cohen.
*****************************

Buchanan’s family farm in Tennessee
READER COMMENTS
David Seltzer
Jun 6 2025 at 2:01pm
Pierre: “It seems to me the spirit of liberalism, the spirit of classical liberalism, or the spirit of liberty if you want, can be a kind of justification that sort of gets you away form this ultimate absurdity in a way.” Camus’s L’Étranger, Kierkegaard and Jean-Paul Sartre addressed the absurdity of life in the face of the inevitable. Why try when we all end up in a plot somewhere. I’ve grappled with that question from the age of seven. I recently understood that trying and grappling with that folly is precisely what imbues humans with dignity. That dignity in every individual, demands respect for their autonomy in the spirit of liberty. As for immortality, it maybe the long-lasting impact of a person’s life. Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations and Theory of Moral Sentiments have informed readers long after his death in 1790.
Pierre Lemieux
Jun 6 2025 at 4:24pm
David: Your penultimate sentence may be close to a common denominator for all classical or libertarian schools of thought.
Jose Pablo
Jun 6 2025 at 11:16pm
Why try when we all end up in a plot somewhere
Well, why not try when we all end up in a plot somewhere
I recently understood that trying and grappling with that folly is precisely what imbues humans with dignity
Well, it could also be that this struggle is what keeps us from getting too bored.
After all, we can’t be having sex all the time, can we?
That’s probably why we came up with philosophy: to fill the void.
David Seltzer
Jun 7 2025 at 10:32am
Jose, “After all, we can’t be having sex all the time, can we?” No, but we can try! Mindless propagation of the species? I suspect we are genetically encoded to produce. Boredom may also be a result of not being productive. Einstein worked on a unified field theory almost up to his death. I think he did so because of the challenges and complexities of the work. Not because he was bored. Einstein didn’t accomplish a complete unified field theory, but his theories of relativity, special and general, helped physicists better understand the universe.
Jose Pablo
Jun 7 2025 at 12:20pm
Einstein didn’t accomplish a complete unified field theory, but his theories of relativity, special and general, helped physicists better understand the universe.
Clearly, he wasn’t even following your recommendation to at least try.
In this regard, Oppenheimer is a much more complicated case, he was very good at trying!
Thomas L Hutcheson
Jun 6 2025 at 2:50pm
Although I DO
“look forward to the resurrection of the dead,
and the life of the world to come.”
that is not the reason (some might even think it woud be reason against) I share Buchanan’s intense interest in the kind of world today’s policies promote far beyond my life and that life of my children.
Hari Seldon? 🙂
Pierre Lemieux
Jun 6 2025 at 4:11pm
Thomas: With whom do you hangout who makes you speak in tongues like that? Do you mean that interpersonal comparisons of utility will be useful in the Seldon Crisis to come?
Craig
Jun 6 2025 at 5:21pm
What we do in life echoes in eternity – Russel Crowe as Maximus in Gladiator.
“Why is it that I am interested in what’s going to happen when I am no longer around. In my case, it can’t be genetic because I don’t have any children”
The gene doesn’t know, its under the surfacing impelling you to act, whether you have a kid or not, and of sibling, 1st cousin, 2nd cousin, have children. One cares because its in our nature to care…..sonetimes of course such impulses are for evil, ie Hitler’s vision of a thousand year Reich.
Pierre Lemieux
Jun 7 2025 at 12:22am
Craig: I also wondered about this sentence. I finally concluded something like this: if he had children, he would have a gene-influenced reason to feel immortal (just having the gene does not provide the object of desire); since he doesn’t have children, he needs to find another way to satisfy his urge. I hope we have a reader, perhaps an evolutionary biologist, who could enlighten us.
Monte
Jun 7 2025 at 11:10am
Life is both, ay? And we are eternal in a sense, made possible by Higgs boson (the God particle) – a universal force that connects us to the fabric of existence.
Jose Pablo
Jun 7 2025 at 2:51pm
Certainly, hope is the last thing to die.
At some point, you have to surrender to the overwhelming evidence: all we are is dust in the wind.
Sometimes, accepting defeat is the fastest route to peace.
Monte
Jun 7 2025 at 11:23pm
Wow! So we’re simply soulless, wet robots who lose our charge after about 80 years? I’m going with Duncan McDougal’s 1907 conclusion that the human soul is tangible and weighs ~21 grams with either wings or horns, depending on how you live.
Jose Pablo
Jun 9 2025 at 4:29pm
McDougall’s conclusions sound about right to me.
May I see photos on Instagram of both sets, wings, and horns, before making my final choice?
Monte
Jun 10 2025 at 6:30pm
Sight unseen, no refunds.
Roger McKinney
Jun 8 2025 at 4:04pm
Had Buchanan done his research as Hayek did, he would have known that theologians distilled the principles of classical liberalism from natural law and the Bible. The amazing success of nations built on classical liberalism is a good defense of the wisdom of Christianity. Sadly, Hayek never abandoned his atheism on spite of this knowledge. In his last book, he proposed a religion worshipping the principles of classical liberalism rather than the God who gave them. Very odd.