
Let’s quit producing both the penny and the nickel.
On Super Bowl Sunday, President Trump announced that the federal government would stop producing pennies. Good for him. This is long overdue.
This week, I contacted a former Marine student, Stephanie King, who, in 2006, had approached me with a thesis topic. Often when students had ideas for thesis topics that other faculty found strange or unusual, the faculty would recommend that the student come to me, probably because they regarded me as strange and unusual. I prefer to call it open-minded.
Stephanie told me that she wanted to write a thesis arguing for getting rid of the penny. I don’t tend to say yes to thesis topics for which the person already knows the answer he or she wants. I need to see a solid case in such situations. So I asked questions. The big one was, “What does it cost to produce a penny?” Once Stephanie answered that the cost had already exceeded one cent, I agreed to supervise her thesis.
It was a pleasant experience. I always liked supervising theses for which the authors were motivated and knew where they wanted to go. The thesis is titled, “Common Cents? The Role of Pennies in the U.S. Economy,” December 2006. It can be found here.
Here’s the abstract of her thesis:
This thesis analyzes the impact that the elimination of pennies would have on the U.S. and global economies. This analysis is then compared to the Department of Defense’s policy of not utilizing pennies in any of its overseas bases, and examines the pros and cons of this course of action on the exchanges and its customers. The objective of this thesis is to identify the financial burden, if any, of maintaining pennies in the U.S. currency to both the government and its citizens. The body of this thesis explores whether or not the U.S. government should continue the production and use of pennies or if the DOD’s model could work in the greater economy. This thesis finds that the soundest approach the government could take to deal with this issue is the current legislation proposed by Arizona Representative Kolbe, who proposes that the government stop producing pennies, and that businesses utilize the rounding approach to deal with all transactions ending in cents.
And here’s one of the key paragraphs:
Every year, the U.S. Mint produces millions of new pennies to place into circulation. The penny is the most produced coin, yet it is the least circulated currency in the U.S. economy. If this is the case, it is easy to wonder why the government continues to produce new pennies. Historically, the production of pennies and their subsequent sale to banks has resulted in big money for the government, in the form of seigniorage. In recent years, this profit has decreased significantly from what it was in the past, primarily due to the rise in the cost of copper and zinc which is used to produce the penny. In May 2006, the U.S. Mint announced that by the end of the fiscal year, the penny would cost more to produce than what its face value was worth. Hence, this seigniorage would no longer exist. Not only would the government not be earning any profits from the production of pennies, but it would also be losing money by producing them. As a result, the government would be subsidizing the production of pennies, even though they are the least circulated currency in the economy.
The cost of producing a penny has increased substantially, as Timothy Taylor, the Conversable Economist, recently noted.
Indeed, as Tim showed, it’s also now time to quit producing the nickel.
READER COMMENTS
Scott Sumner
Feb 18 2025 at 7:28pm
Even the dime is questionable. In 1900, the smallest coin was a penny, which had the purchasing power of 38 cents today. We didn’t even use a coin as small as today’s quarter.
David Henderson
Feb 18 2025 at 11:53pm
Good point, Scott.
And your point about the quarter becomes even stronger when you consider that our per capita wealth is a multiple of per capita wealth in 1900.
So I say, “Get rid of the quarter.”
MarkW
Feb 19 2025 at 7:48am
Since 1965 inflation has reduced the value of the dollar by almost exactly an order of magnitude, so we should probably get rid of the penny, nickel, and paper dollar bill (today’s $10 bill is just a 1965 $1 bill). The quarter is debatable — probably we should mint a smaller 50 cent piece (the 2025 nickel) and dollar coin (the 2025 dime).
Mark Brophy
Feb 18 2025 at 7:52pm
Coining copper pennies was a major technological advance in the 18th century. Before, the country needed pennies but couldn’t produce them. The United States first produced pennies in 1793 and Britain followed 4 years later. Half-cents were coined from 1793-1857. During that period Mexican coins were widely used in the United States.
David Henderson
Feb 18 2025 at 11:54pm
Interesting.
Craig
Feb 18 2025 at 9:52pm
The government should discontinue paying more than a penny to produce a penny, but if it can produce a penny and reap a seigniorage benefit from doing so, then no reason to discontinue it. US should also take paper dollar bills out of circulation and allow the coins, which obviously do exist, to take over.
Incidentally there are copper penny sorting machines out there, saw a YT video of one guy using it.
Alan Goldhammer
Feb 19 2025 at 9:02am
I don’t remember the exact time in the past that I noticed gumball machines at the mall raised the price to a quarter for a large ball of bubble gum. I’m old enough to remember when the price was a nickel. Inflation at work and perhaps an argument for not minting dimes either.
David Henderson
Feb 19 2025 at 10:21am
I remember when it was a nickel too.
Also, in Canada, we were able to buy jawbreakers, 3 for 1 cent. This was in the mid to late 1950s. They weren’t the jawbreakers that Americans buy. They were much smaller.
In the 1950s, my father gave my sister, brother, and me each 10 cents a week for our allowance. My brother and I would go down to the farm implement store where they had a Coke machine with little Cokes (I think they were between 6 and 10 ounces). We would get change and put in 7 cents each for a Coke. Then we would sit on the furniture and my brother would make faces and make me laugh until the Coke came out my nose. Then we would go to the counter and I would ask for something–a paper towel or a cloth or something–to clean up the mess.
Alan Goldhammer
Feb 20 2025 at 8:39am
I had a similar childhood!!!! My parents were a little more generous, I got a quarter each week. There was as small grocery store (maybe 2000 sq ft) down the hill from where we lived in San Diego. It was a block up from the ocean and my brother and I would walk down each Saturday and buy a couple of comic books and some candy and still have some change left.
R R Schoettker
Feb 19 2025 at 12:40pm
Let’s cut to the chase; the government should not be making ANY money. This should be the function of the free market and private enterprise.
Mike Burnson
Feb 19 2025 at 6:57pm
By coincidence, I have been in Brazil the past week and was thinking these same thoughts. What triggered it was receiving change at a grocery that included both 5- and 2-cent coins. The real is only worth about $0.18, so their nickel is less than our penny, and their 2-cent is barely over 1/3 of our penny. In other countries, I have received aluminum coins for change.
I suppose part of the difference between countries is the income level: when average income is only 20 real per hour (minimum is well below that), fractions of a real add up quickly. This is precisely why companies establish subsidiaries in Brazil, of which I have been to three: the VATs in Europe are so severe that it is more cost-effective to manufacture to a limited degree in Europe, then ship to Brazil for certain processing (I audit metal finishing), then pay to ship back. Shipping 20,000 miles is lower cost than their insidious VATs. The cost savings from labor are just a few percent of the total input costs.
Comments are closed.